CWare TechnologiesEnd of exam.
D13. Limitations & enhancements: e.g., legacy devices lack TEE-backed rollback protections; propose forcing vbmeta rollback protection, mandatory verified boot enforcement, remote attestation and enrollment checks, improved OTA signing and key provisioning; trade-offs: user flexibility, update complexity, device bricking risk, OEM coordination. D14. Ethics/legal: follow coordinated disclosure, 90-day baseline, expedited for high-risk, embargo options, provide PoC only to vendor, offer mitigations and patches, handle dual-use info carefully, notify CERTs, respect laws and user consent for testing. addrom bypass android 9
B6. Boot process: boot ROM → bootloader (primary/secondary) → verified boot signature checks → kernel init → init.rc → zygote/framework; integrity checks at bootloader and kernel (dm-verity), verified boot metadata enforced by bootloader/boot verifier. B7. Partition layouts: A/B = two sets for seamless updates, supports rollback protections, less reliance on recovery; non A/B uses recovery partition and OTA writes — both affect where tampering would occur and persistence techniques. B8. Hardware keystore & TEE: keys stored and used in TEE, HSM-backed attestation, making raw key extraction difficult; mitigations: require attacker to bypass TEE/hardware, which is costly. B9. OEM factors: bootloader lock policy and unlock token handling; whether Verified Boot enforcement is strict or permissive; availability of fastboot flashing and signed images; presence of OEM-specific recovery/diagnostic modes. End of exam
A1. Definition: explanation of "Addrom bypass" as bypassing address/ROM protections—expected to refer to boot/firmware/verified-boot bypassing; threat model: attacker with physical access or privileged software, goals (persistency, data exfiltration, bypassing verified boot). A2. Mechanisms: Verified Boot (dm-verity), SELinux enforcing mode, Secure Boot/bootloader lock, hardware-backed keystore/TEE, file-based encryption (FBE). (Any three) A3. Verified Boot + dm-verity: integrity verification of boot and system partitions; bootloader verifies boot image signature, kernel enables dm-verity for rootfs, rollbacks prevented via metadata. A4. SELinux: Mandatory Access Control limits process capabilities, confines services, reduces escalation and lateral movement after bypass. A5. ADB: debugging bridge; if enabled/unrestricted it provides shell and file access; authorized keys and adb authentication are critical. changes to bootloader unlocked flag
C10. Testing plan: verify boot state with getprop ro.boot.verifiedbootstate and vbmeta; use adb shell su?; check dm-verity status via dmesg and vbmeta/veritysetup status; avoid writing to partitions; document outputs, hashes, chain-of-trust, and reproduction steps. Include commands: adb reboot bootloader; fastboot getvar all; adb shell getprop ro.boot.verifiedbootstate; dmesg | grep -i verity. Emphasize consent and backups. C11. ADB over network risk: remote shell access, key interception; mitigations: disable TCP ADB, require authorization (adb keys), network firewall rules, MDM policies to block, charging station policies (USB Restricted Mode), educate users, use USB host-based charging-only cables; expected effectiveness assessed. C12. Detection checklist: high-value signals — ro.boot.verifiedbootstate not "green", changes to bootloader unlocked flag, presence of unknown system suid binaries, unexpected persistent services, vbmeta mismatches, kernel logs showing verity errors, abnormal boot count/resets, ADB over network enablement. Log sources: device logs (logcat, dmesg), MDM enrollment telemetry, SafetyNet/Play Integrity signals, fastboot state responses. Prioritize boot verification and bootloader lock state.