Now, considering mobile specifics: orientation, touch gestures, device-specific elements. Maybe handling permissions if the app asks for any. Also, handling different screen sizes.
testCaseStep("Submit Match Details", "Checking confirmation..."); sendKeys("id/match_name", "Test_Rival_Match"); click("id/confirm_button"); verifyText("id/match_status", "Match Created", "Match creation failed."); stepEnd("PASSED"); } ID: TCL-003 Objective: Verify error handling (e.g., invalid login). Tbao Hub Blue Lock Rivals Mobile Script
testCaseStep("Validate Home Screen", "Checking welcome message..."); verifyText(TEXT_WELCOME_MESSAGE, "Welcome Back", "Failed to detect welcome message."); stepEnd("PASSED"); } ID: TCL-002 Objective: Verify match creation functionality. testCaseStep("Submit Match Details", "Checking confirmation
Include functions for login, logout, navigating menus. Handle any API calls if the app communicates with a backend. Use T-Plan's keywords or methods to interact with the app elements. Maybe use image recognition if elements don't have stable IDs. Handle any API calls if the app communicates with a backend
What about test case IDs? The script should have a unique ID. Test objectives are to validate core functionalities like user registration, match creation, performance under load (if applicable), but since it's a script, maybe more about basic workflows.